Compare HTC 10 Lifestyle vs Huawei Note 8

Feature Comparison

  • The 6.6 inch Screen Size on the Huawei Note 8 is 21.0% more
  • Internal Storage of HTC 10 Lifestyle is the same as Huawei Note 8
  • Huawei Note 8's got 25.0% more RAM
 
HTC 10 Lifestyle
Huawei Note 8
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
88 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.2 inch 6.6 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels -   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
564.8 PPI -   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
2.5D Curved Glass -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm HiSilicon Kirin   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 HiSilicon Kirin 955   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 Mali-T880 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
12MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geotagging, Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Digital zoom, Face detection, HDR, Optical image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Scene mode, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Self timer, Macro mode, Raw RGBW Sensor, Optical Image Stabilization   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
HTC Sense 8 EMUI 4.1   
OS Upgradable To
Android 7.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
USB Type C USB Type C   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, Stereo Speakers, GPS Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
145.9 x 71.9 x 9.0 178.8 × 90.9 × 7.18   
Weight
161 grams 219 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Carbon Gray, Topaz Gold Gold, Silver, Gray   
Build Material
Metal Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
23GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
2TB 128GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE band (2100), (1800), (850), (2600), (900), (800), (700), (2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 4500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) -   
Removable Battery
No -   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
Yes, Quick Charge 3.0 Yes   

HTC 10 Lifestyle vs Huawei Note 8 Specs

Specs
HTC 10 LifestyleHuawei Note 8  
Screen Size 5.2 inch6.6 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 12MP13MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh4500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC 10 Lifestyle with Huawei Note 8. When you see HTC 10 Lifestyle Vs Huawei Note 8 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC 10 Lifestyle stands against Huawei Note 8 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC 10 Lifestyle is currently Rs. 20,890. The prices for both these products were updated December 13, 2017.
Report an error on this page