Compare HTC Desire 820G Plus vs Panasonic Eluga Pulse

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 820G Plus's is 9.0% more than Panasonic Eluga Pulse
  • Both HTC Desire 820G Plus and Panasonic Eluga Pulse have same Internal Storage
  • Panasonic Eluga Pulse's got 50.0% more RAM
 
HTC Desire 820G Plus
Panasonic Eluga Pulse
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
47 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
60 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Face detection, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Digital zoom, ISO Settings, Geo tagging, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Self timer, HDR, Scene mode, Touch focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Triple LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, IR Blaster   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
157.7 x 78.74 x 7.74 143 x 71.2 x 7.95   
Weight
155 grams 133 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Santorini White, Milkyway Grey Gold, Silver   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM -   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 3G, 2G   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
- GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300) MHz   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

HTC Desire 820G Plus vs Panasonic Eluga Pulse Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 820G PlusPanasonic Eluga Pulse  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 820G Plus with Panasonic Eluga Pulse. When you see HTC Desire 820G Plus Vs Panasonic Eluga Pulse comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 820G Plus stands against Panasonic Eluga Pulse and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 820G Plus is currently Rs. 10,490. The prices for both these products were updated December 13, 2017.
Report an error on this page