Compare HTC Desire 820G Plus vs Sony Xperia M2

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 820G Plus's got 12.0% more Screen Size
  • The HTC Desire 820G Plus's got 16GB Internal Storage, while Sony Xperia M2's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • RAM of HTC Desire 820G Plus is the same as Sony Xperia M2
 
HTC Desire 820G Plus
Sony Xperia M2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
91 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
60 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 4.8 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 229.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Expposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat -   
OS Detail
- Android (4.3)   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
157.7 x 78.74 x 7.74 139.7 x 71.1 x 8.6   
Weight
155 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Santorini White, Milkyway Grey Black, White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - D2303   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) - D2303 LTE band 2(1900), 4(1700/2100), 7(2600), 17(700) - D2306   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

HTC Desire 820G Plus vs Sony Xperia M2 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 820G PlusSony Xperia M2  
Screen Size 5.5 inch4.8 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP0.3MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 820G Plus with Sony Xperia M2. When you see HTC Desire 820G Plus Vs Sony Xperia M2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 820G Plus stands against Sony Xperia M2 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 820G Plus is currently Rs. 10,490. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page