Compare HTC Butterfly X920D vs Samsung Galaxy Golden Dual Flip I9230

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Butterfly X920D has 25.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of HTC Butterfly X920D is the same as Samsung Galaxy Golden Dual Flip I9230
  • HTC Butterfly X920D has 25.0% more RAM
 
HTC Butterfly X920D
Samsung Galaxy Golden Dual Flip I9230
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
97 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
52 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 3.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD Super AMOLED   
Pixel Density
440.6 PPI 252 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 2 -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
2GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Adreno 320 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2.1MP 1.9MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Continuous shooting, HDR, Exposure compensation, Geotagging, Face & Smile Detection, Digita zoom, Panorama, White balance setting, Scene mode Geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 4.2 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.2 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Non-Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Barometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143 x 70.5 x 9.1 118 x 59.5 x 15.8   
Weight
140 grams 179 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- -   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2020mAh 1820mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

HTC Butterfly X920D vs Samsung Galaxy Golden Dual Flip I9230 Specs

Specs
HTC Butterfly X920DSamsung Galaxy Golden Dual Flip I9230  
Screen Size 5 inch3.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 2020mAh1820mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2.1MP1.9MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Butterfly X920D with Samsung Galaxy Golden Dual Flip I9230. When you see HTC Butterfly X920D Vs Samsung Galaxy Golden Dual Flip I9230 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Butterfly X920D stands against Samsung Galaxy Golden Dual Flip I9230 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page