Compare HTC Desire 210 vs Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM

Feature Comparison

  • The Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM's got 5 inch Screen Size, while HTC Desire 210's Screen Size is 4 inch
  • Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM's 8GB Internal Storage is more than HTC Desire 210's 4GB Internal Storage
  • Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM's 1GB RAM is more than HTC Desire 210's 512MB RAM
 
HTC Desire 210
Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
92 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
56 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6572 Qualcomm Snapdragon 200   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 Adreno 302   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Continuous shooting, Panorama Geo-Tagging   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) 480p Video Recording   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Windows Phone   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Windows Phone 8.1   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
125.7 x 65 x 10.5 144 x 73.7 x 9.4   
Weight
130 grams 152 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Cyan, Orange, White, Black   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 3.39GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1300mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
No -   

HTC Desire 210 vs Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 210Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1300mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Attractive design
  • Available in bright shiny colours, making the phone standout in the segment
  • Color reproduction on screen is good
  • User removable and replaceable back panel
The Bad
  • Substantial shutter lag makes the camera really difficult to use
  • Lacks HD Video recording on the rear camera
  • Overall the performance is not very snappy
  • Camera app takes a long time to load, which leads to you missing out on shots

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 210 with Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM. When you see HTC Desire 210 Vs Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 210 stands against Microsoft Lumia 540 Dual SIM and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page