Compare HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM vs Gionee F103 3GB RAM

Feature Comparison

  • Gionee F103 3GB RAM has 5 inch Screen Size and HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • The Gionee F103 3GB RAM has 16GB Internal Storage, which is 75.0% more
  • The 3GB RAM on the Gionee F103 3GB RAM is 83.0% more
 
HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM
Gionee F103 3GB RAM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
44 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582M MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Face Detection, Fixed Focus Geo-tagging, Autofocus, Macro Mode, Continuous Shooting, Digital Zoom, Digital Image Stabilization, Panorama, HDR, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Amigo 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132.4 x 68 x 11.3 143 x 70.3 x 7.95   
Weight
140 grams 136 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, White   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 9.49GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2400mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM vs Gionee F103 3GB RAM Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 310 512MB RAMGionee F103 3GB RAM  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2400mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Gionee F103 3GB RAM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Lightweight Design
The Bad
  • Average Camera Output
  • Average Performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM with Gionee F103 3GB RAM. When you see HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM Vs Gionee F103 3GB RAM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM stands against Gionee F103 3GB RAM and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Gionee F103 3GB RAM is Rs. 8,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page