Compare HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM vs Gionee F103 Pro

Feature Comparison

  • The Gionee F103 Pro's got 5 inch Screen Size, while HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM's Screen Size is 4.5 inch
  • Gionee F103 Pro's Internal Storage is 75.0% more
  • Gionee F103 Pro's RAM is 83.0% more
 
HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM
Gionee F103 Pro
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
39 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582M MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Face Detection, Fixed Focus Geotagging, Autofocus, FHD Recording (1080p), 30 Frames per second   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
HTC Sense 5.1 Amigo OS 3.2   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132.4 x 68 x 11.3 142 x 68 x 6   
Weight
140 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, White, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories 1 Year Manufacturer Warranty and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Cover, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2400mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM vs Gionee F103 Pro Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 310 512MB RAMGionee F103 Pro  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2400mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM with Gionee F103 Pro. When you see HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM Vs Gionee F103 Pro comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM stands against Gionee F103 Pro and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Gionee F103 Pro is Rs. 7,462. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page