Compare HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Intex Aqua Ace 4G's got 10.0% more Screen Size
  • The Intex Aqua Ace 4G's got 16GB Internal Storage, while HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM's Internal Storage is 4GB
  • Intex Aqua Ace 4G's RAM is 83.0% more
 
HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM
Intex Aqua Ace 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
41 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582M MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Face Detection, Fixed Focus Add Face Detection, Gesture Capture, Take Photo While Recording, Voice Capture,Panorama, Mira Vision   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
HTC Sense 5.1 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132.4 x 68 x 11.3 145 x 71.5 x 6.7   
Weight
140 grams 122 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.01GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 310 512MB RAMIntex Aqua Ace 4G  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Intex Aqua Ace 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for excellent multitasking experience
  • Support 4G LTE network in India
The Bad
  • Average battery life
  • Not that great processor performance
  • Android Lollipop is a slight disappointment in Marshmallow era

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM with Intex Aqua Ace 4G. When you see HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM Vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 310 512MB RAM stands against Intex Aqua Ace 4G and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Ace 4G is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page