Compare HTC Desire 516 vs Meizu M3S

Feature Comparison

  • Both HTC Desire 516 and Meizu M3S have same Screen Size
  • Meizu M3S's 16GB Internal Storage is more than HTC Desire 516's 4GB Internal Storage
  • The RAM on Meizu M3S is 50.0% more
 
HTC Desire 516
We Love
Meizu M3S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
41 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.3 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 302 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Face detection, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Face detection, ISO settings, Geo-tagging, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Panorama, Touch focus, Macro mode Continuous shooting, Digital zoon, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch Focus   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- FlyMe OS 5.1   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.3 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
140 x 72 x 9.7 69.9 x 141.9 x 8.3   
Weight
160 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Pearl White Gold, Gray, Silver, Pink   
Build Material
Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1950mAh 3020mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

HTC Desire 516 vs Meizu M3S Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 516Meizu M3S  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1950mAh3020mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Meizu M3S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Crisp display
  • Well built and handy form factor
  • Fingerprint sensor embedded in the home button
The Bad
  • Runs on dated Android 5.1 Lollipop
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Average overall performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 516 with Meizu M3S. When you see HTC Desire 516 Vs Meizu M3S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 516 stands against Meizu M3S and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page