Compare HTC Desire 516 vs Oppo F1

Feature Comparison

  • Both HTC Desire 516 and Oppo F1 have same Screen Size
  • The Oppo F1's got 16GB Internal Storage, while HTC Desire 516's Internal Storage is 4GB
  • The Oppo F1's got 3GB RAM, while HTC Desire 516's RAM is 1GB
 
HTC Desire 516
Oppo F1
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
38 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.3 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 616   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 302 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama, Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Digital image stabilization, HDR, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation. self timer, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) ColorOS 2.1   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
140 x 72 x 9.7 143.50 x 71 x 7.25   
Weight
160 grams 134 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Pearl White Gold, Rose Gold   
Build Material
- Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 0.687W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.16W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Cover   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz   
3G Bands
- UMTS 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1950mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

HTC Desire 516 vs Oppo F1 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 516Oppo F1  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1950mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Oppo F1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Selfie camera is quite good, if you click a lot of selfies
  • Metal Body Construction, Great Build
The Bad
  • No NFC Support
  • Smaller battery may be a problem for power users

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 516 with Oppo F1. When you see HTC Desire 516 Vs Oppo F1 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 516 stands against Oppo F1 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Oppo F1 is Rs. 19,299. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page