Compare HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GB vs LG K7

Feature Comparison

  • LG K7's got 5.0% more Screen Size
  • HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GB's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • LG K7's RAM is 33.0% more
 
HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GB
LG K7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
58 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
234.4 PPI 196 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
139.8 x 69.65 x 9.8 143.6 x 72.5 x 8.9   
Weight
154 grams -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Glacier Blue, Lacquer Black, Fervor Red, Stealth Black White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.96GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2125mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GB vs LG K7 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GBLG K7  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2125mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

LG K7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality and overall shape of the phone
  • Some decent software add-ons thanks to the LG skin
  • Support for 4G and VoLTE
The Bad
  • The display is underwhelming with poor resolution
  • No ambient light sensor and notifications LED
  • Slow and sluggish performance

HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Lag-free performance in day to day tasks
  • Good camera performance when taking still shots
  • Available in interesting color choices
  • Neat and interesting unique design instead of the regular candy bar design
The Bad
  • No HD display
  • 3G support is limited to only the primary SIM slot
  • Video recorded from the camera is poor due to very high compression
  • Less than adequate battery backup

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GB with LG K7. When you see HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GB Vs LG K7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GB stands against LG K7 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 526G+ Dual Sim 16GB is currently Rs. 7,999. The lowest price for LG K7 is Rs. 7,690. The prices for both these products were updated December 9, 2017.
Report an error on this page