Compare HTC Desire 600 Dual Sim vs HTC Desire 820

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 820 has 18.0% more Screen Size
  • The HTC Desire 820's Internal Storage measures in at 16GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • HTC Desire 820 has 2GB RAM and HTC Desire 600 Dual Sim has 1GB RAM
 
HTC Desire 600 Dual Sim
HTC Desire 820
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
68 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.8 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 203 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
1.6MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
1/3.2'' Sensor Size, 1.4µm Pixel Size, Geo-tagging, Face & Smile Detection Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
134.8 x 67 x 9.3 157.7 x 78.7 x 7.7   
Weight
130 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- White, Red, Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.2GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1860mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 600 Dual Sim vs HTC Desire 820 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 600 Dual SimHTC Desire 820  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1860mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.6MP8MP  

HTC Desire 820 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Dual tone design is unique and eye-catching
  • The front facing stereo speakers are excellent
  • The Sense UI is sleek and light on memory
  • HTC Zoe is a nice little edition for you to share quick video clips
The Bad
  • The back of the phone can pick up a ton of scratches
  • Lacks NFC connectivity
  • Video recording in 1080P is not a great experience
  • Battery life is erratic

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 600 Dual Sim with HTC Desire 820. When you see HTC Desire 600 Dual Sim Vs HTC Desire 820 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 600 Dual Sim stands against HTC Desire 820 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 820 is Rs. 12,750. The prices for both these products were updated December 9, 2017.
Report an error on this page