Compare HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim vs Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim's got 14.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim's is 50.0% more than Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace
  • HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim's 1GB RAM is more than Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace's 512MB RAM
 
HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim
Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
91 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.3 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD Super AMOLED   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 217 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek -   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 -   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
1GB 512MB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
BSI Sensor Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146.9 x 70.9 x 8.1 130.1 x 67.6 x 9.5   
Weight
138 grams 128 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Blue Lagoon, White Birch Black, Ceramic White, Gold, Blue   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories 6 Month Accessories Warranty   
Body SAR
- 1.22W/kg   
Head SAR
- 1.57W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.34GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Nano SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 1800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim vs Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 626G+ Dual SimSamsung Galaxy J1 Ace  
Screen Size 5 inch4.3 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 1GB512MB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh1800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim with Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace. When you see HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim Vs Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim stands against Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 626G+ Dual Sim is currently Rs. 8,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace is Rs. 6,290. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page