Compare HTC Desire 816 vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)

Feature Comparison

  • The HTC Desire 816's Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 5.0% more
  • HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • The HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)'s RAM measures in at 2GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 25.0% more
 
HTC Desire 816
HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
58 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 569 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
HTC Sense UI 6.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 8 150.99 x 71.99 x 9.61   
Weight
165 grams 168 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray, Orange Silver, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2840mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 816 vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB)  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2840mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

HTC Desire 816 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Impressive sound output
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Good battery backup
The Bad
  • Glossy back attracts smudges and fingerprints
  • Supports nano SIM cards only

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816 with HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB). When you see HTC Desire 816 Vs HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816 stands against HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816 is currently Rs. 19,999. The lowest price for HTC One M9+ (2GB/16GB) is Rs. 14,450. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page