Compare HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim vs LeEco Le 1s Eco

Feature Comparison

  • Both HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim and LeEco Le 1s Eco have same Screen Size
  • LeEco Le 1s Eco's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • The LeEco Le 1s Eco's got 3GB RAM, while HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim's RAM is 1GB
 
HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim
LeEco Le 1s Eco
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
52 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
55 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6795T Helio X10   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, BSI Sensor Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) , Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Touch to focus,   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- EUI 5.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.7 x 7.9 151.1 x 74.2 x 7.5   
Weight
158 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold, Silver   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 24.4GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim vs LeEco Le 1s Eco Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual SimLeEco Le 1s Eco  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

LeEco Le 1s Eco Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy finish and premium metallic build
  • Vibrant 1080p Display
  • Smooth Performance
  • InfraRed Universal Remote Control Function
  • Fingerprint Sensor
The Bad
  • Average camera performance
  • Confusing User Interface

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim with LeEco Le 1s Eco. When you see HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim Vs LeEco Le 1s Eco comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim stands against LeEco Le 1s Eco and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816G Octa Core Dual Sim is currently Rs. 13,999. The lowest price for LeEco Le 1s Eco is Rs. 10,249. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page