Compare HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim vs Lenovo Phab

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Lenovo Phab is 21.0% more
  • Lenovo Phab has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Lenovo Phab has 50.0% more RAM
 
HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim
Lenovo Phab
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
82 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
55 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6.98 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 210.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, BSI Sensor -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- Vibe UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
156.6 x 78.74 x 7.99 186 x 97 x 8.9   
Weight
158 grams 250 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gray, Blue, Orange Tuxedo Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.3GB 23.91GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 4250mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim vs Lenovo Phab Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 816G Dual SimLenovo Phab  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6.98 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh4250mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo Phab Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge display gives a great multimedia experience
  • Great battery life with 4250mAh unit
  • 4G LTE enabled
  • Expandable storage up to 64GB
The Bad
  • Below average display quality with just 210PPI
  • Mediocre performance with a chipset for budget devices
  • Not that great camera output
  • Huge size for comfortable usage as a mobile device

HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Front Stereo Speakers
  • Excellent Camera
  • Dual SIM
The Bad
  • Not that sharp display at just 267PPI
  • Below average processor and just 1GB of RAM
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Way outdated Android version
  • Lacks 4G support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim with Lenovo Phab. When you see HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim Vs Lenovo Phab comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim stands against Lenovo Phab and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 816G Dual Sim is currently Rs. 16,900. The prices for both these products were updated December 9, 2017.
Report an error on this page