Compare HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim vs Lenovo Phab 2

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Phab 2 has 6.4 inch Screen Size and HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim has 5.5 inch Screen Size
  • The Lenovo Phab 2 has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • RAM of Lenovo Phab 2's is 33.0% more than HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
 
HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
Lenovo Phab 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
82 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.5 PPI 229 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT8735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP3 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
4MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama, OIS, BSI Sensor Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
157.7 × 78.9 × 7.9 175 x 89.5 x 5.5   
Weight
150 grams 225 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Dark Grey Champagne Gold, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.14GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes, (Uses SIM2 slot)   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 4050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim vs Lenovo Phab 2 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire 828 Dual SimLenovo Phab 2  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh4050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 4MP5MP  

HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Lenovo Phab 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy & classy build quality
The Bad
  • Low pixel density
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • Mediocre camera

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim with Lenovo Phab 2. When you see HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Vs Lenovo Phab 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim stands against Lenovo Phab 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim is currently Rs. 9,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 13, 2017.
Report an error on this page