Compare HTC Desire XC T329D vs Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392

 
HTC Desire XC T329D
Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392
Add
Karbonn A7+
Karbonn A7+
Add
Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 ...
Samsung Galaxy S Duos 2 S7582
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 / 100
90 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52Value For Money
55Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 4 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.24 PPI 233 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Notch
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
- -   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm -   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1GHz   
Processor
- -   
Co-Processor
- -   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Single-Core   
RAM
768MB 512MB   
Graphics
Adreno 203 -   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Camera
- -   
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 3.15MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Triple Rear Camera
- -   
Four Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
- -   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
HTC Image Chip, 30 Continuous Shooting, Video Pic, BSI, Geotagging -   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash -   
Zoom
- -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich Android 4.1 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Android (4.0) -   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Midnight Black, White, Wine Red   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- 0.27W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.28W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
107 grams 124 grams   
Dimensions (mm)
119.5 x 62.3 x 9.4 121.50 x 63.10 x 10.85   
Height
- -   
Width
- -   
Thickness
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 2.05GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM + CDMA GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz. CDMA 800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
UMTS 850 / 1900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
SIM 1 Bands
- -   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1650mAh 1500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   
Standby Time
- -   
Talk Time
- -   
Multimedia     
Music
- -   
Video Player
- -   
Loudspeaker
- -   

HTC Desire XC T329D vs Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 Specs

Specs
HTC Desire XC T329DSamsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392  
Screen Size 4 inch4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP3.15MP  
RAM 768MB512MB  
Battery Capacity 1650mAh1500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution   
This page helps you compare HTC Desire XC T329D with Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392. When you see HTC Desire XC T329D Vs Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC Desire XC T329D stands against Samsung Galaxy Trend GT-S7392 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated March 27, 2019.
Report an error on this page