Compare HTC One Dual Sim vs Oppo Find 5

Feature Comparison

  • Oppo Find 5's Screen Size is 5.0% more
  • Internal Storage of HTC One Dual Sim's is 50.0% more than Oppo Find 5
  • RAM of HTC One Dual Sim is the same as Oppo Find 5
 
HTC One Dual Sim
Oppo Find 5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 / 100
50 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
63Value For Money
Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
468.7 PPI 440.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 2 Corning Gorilla Glass 2   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 320 Adreno 320   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
4MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2.1MP 1.9MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Continuos Shooting, 1/3'' Sensor Size, 2µm Pixel Size, Image Recording, Simultaneous HD video and image recording, Digital Zoom, Optical Image stabilization, HDR, Face detection, Burst mode, Smile detection Sony Exmor Stacked CMOS Sensor, Geo tagging, Self-timer, HDR, Touch focus, ISO settings, Face detection, Panorama, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean -   
OS Detail
- Android (4.1)   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, IR Blaster Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
137.8 x 69.3 x 10.4 141.8 x 68.8 x 8.8   
Weight
156 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Black -   
Build Material
Metal Unibody -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories -   
Body SAR
- 0.745W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.487W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual, Cover   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB -   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

HTC One Dual Sim vs Oppo Find 5 Specs

Specs
HTC One Dual SimOppo Find 5  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 4MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2.1MP1.9MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One Dual Sim with Oppo Find 5. When you see HTC One Dual Sim Vs Oppo Find 5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One Dual Sim stands against Oppo Find 5 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC One Dual Sim is currently Rs. 35,499. The prices for both these products were updated February 23, 2018.
Report an error on this page