Compare HTC One (M8 Eye) vs Phicomm Passion 660

Feature Comparison

  • Both HTC One (M8 Eye) and Phicomm Passion 660 have same Screen Size
  • Both HTC One (M8 Eye) and Phicomm Passion 660 have same Internal Storage
  • Both HTC One (M8 Eye) and Phicomm Passion 660 have same RAM
 
HTC One (M8 Eye)
Phicomm Passion 660
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
80 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
62 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
441 PPI 440.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
2.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Dual Tone LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Sense 6.0 -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 6.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
146.36 x 70.6 x 9.35 139.50 x 69.00 x 7.40   
Weight
160 grams 110 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Grey, Rose Gold, Silver Black   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 year manufacturer warranty for device, 6 months manufacturer warranty for battery and charger   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 13.5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No Yes   
Fast Charging
No -   

HTC One (M8 Eye) vs Phicomm Passion 660 Specs

Specs
HTC One (M8 Eye)Phicomm Passion 660  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

HTC One (M8 Eye) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Exceptional build quality and design
  • Loud boomsound speakers
  • Good and accurate touch response
  • Subtle curves allow for a good feel in hand
The Bad
  • The 13MP camera fails to impress
  • The ugly antennae line at the back play bit of a spoilsport
  • Not the best battery backup
  • Chamfered edges tend to pick up dents and scruffs very easily

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare HTC One (M8 Eye) with Phicomm Passion 660. When you see HTC One (M8 Eye) Vs Phicomm Passion 660 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how HTC One (M8 Eye) stands against Phicomm Passion 660 and which one you should buy. The best price of HTC One (M8 Eye) is currently Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page