Compare Huawei Ascend G6 vs Motorola Moto M

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Motorola Moto M's is 18.0% more than Huawei Ascend G6
  • Motorola Moto M has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Motorola Moto M has 66.0% more RAM
 
Huawei Ascend G6
We Love
Motorola Moto M
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
19 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
91 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
244.8 PPI 400.53 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek Helio P15   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging PDAF, f/2.0, ZSL, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR, Beautification Mode   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.3) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
- 151.35 x 75.35 x 7.85   
Weight
- 163 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Gold, Silver, Gray   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 3050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Huawei Ascend G6 vs Motorola Moto M Specs

Specs
Huawei Ascend G6Motorola Moto M  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh3050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Motorola Moto M Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Stylish & sturdy build
  • Crisp & vivid display
  • Fast charging via USB Type-C
  • Good front facing camera
The Bad
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Sub-optimal battery life
  • Lacks the usual set of Moto features
  • Mean overall performance
  • Rear camera produces average results

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Huawei Ascend G6 with Motorola Moto M. When you see Huawei Ascend G6 Vs Motorola Moto M comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Huawei Ascend G6 stands against Motorola Moto M and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto M is Rs. 11,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page