Compare Huawei Honor 3X vs HTC One E9+

Feature Comparison

  • Both Huawei Honor 3X and HTC One E9+ have same Screen Size
  • HTC One E9+ has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • The RAM on HTC One E9+ is 33.0% more
 
Huawei Honor 3X
HTC One E9+
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
46 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
66 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 20MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 4MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- Dual-LED Flash, Automatic Simultaneous Video And Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) Sense UI   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
149.5 x 77.4 x 8.9 156.5 x 76.5 x 7.54   
Weight
162 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Meteor Grey, Rose Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 22GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 2TB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
- GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Huawei Honor 3X vs HTC One E9+ Specs

Specs
Huawei Honor 3XHTC One E9+  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP20MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP4MP  

Huawei Honor 3X Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Impressive battery backup
  • 2GB of RAM is good enough for multitasking but not the best experience
The Bad
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Below average display quality and performance
  • Lacks 4G support
  • Very old operating system Android 4.2 Jelly Bean

HTC One E9+ Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Mindboggling display quality at 534PPI with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
  • HTC BoomSound Stereo speakers
  • Metal unibody construction makes it feel premium
  • Decent performance and battery life
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • No fast charging support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Huawei Honor 3X with HTC One E9+. When you see Huawei Honor 3X Vs HTC One E9+ comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Huawei Honor 3X stands against HTC One E9+ and which one you should buy. The best price of Huawei Honor 3X is currently Rs. 18,315. The lowest price for HTC One E9+ is Rs. 30,200. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page