Compare Huawei Honor 4C vs HTC Desire 820G Plus

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 820G Plus's 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than Huawei Honor 4C's 5 inch Screen Size
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the HTC Desire 820G Plus is 50.0% more
  • The Huawei Honor 4C's RAM measures in at 2GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
Huawei Honor 4C
HTC Desire 820G Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
91 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
57 Value For Money Score
60 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 780 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
299.8 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
HiSilicon Kirin MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 620 MediaTek MT6592   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama Geotagging, Touch focus, ISO settings, Digital zoom, Face detection, HDR, Exposure compensation, Panorama, White balance settings, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) HTC Sense 6   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143.3 x 71.9 x 8.8 157.7 x 78.74 x 7.74   
Weight
162 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold, White Santorini White, Milkyway Grey   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
3.4GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
2G, Micro SIM 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2550mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Huawei Honor 4C vs HTC Desire 820G Plus Specs

Specs
Huawei Honor 4CHTC Desire 820G Plus  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2550mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Huawei Honor 4C Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent camera output in daylight
  • Decent performance
  • Crisp and vivid display with 294PPI
The Bad
  • Not that great battery life
  • Heats up while heavy gaming
  • Does not support 4G LTE network

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Huawei Honor 4C with HTC Desire 820G Plus. When you see Huawei Honor 4C Vs HTC Desire 820G Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Huawei Honor 4C stands against HTC Desire 820G Plus and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 820G Plus is Rs. 10,490. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page