Compare iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAM vs Oppo Neo 5 (2015)

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Oppo Neo 5 (2015) is 11.0% more
  • Oppo Neo 5 (2015) has 16GB Internal Storage, whereas iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAM has 4GB Internal Storage
  • Both iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAM and Oppo Neo 5 (2015) have same RAM
 
iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAM
Oppo Neo 5 (2015)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
76 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
62 Value For Money Score
66 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 217.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6582 MediaTek MT6582   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Continuous shooting, Sony IMX 179 Sensor, HDR, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Touch focus, self timer, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Exposure compensation, Geotagging, White balance settings, ISO settings, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
- 131.9 x 65.5 x 8.0   
Weight
109 grams 135 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray, Wine White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, Earphone, Cover   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz   
3G Bands
- UMTS 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1300mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAM vs Oppo Neo 5 (2015) Specs

Specs
iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAMOppo Neo 5 (2015)  
Screen Size 4 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1300mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP2MP  

Oppo Neo 5 (2015) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Full HD video recording capability
  • Dual SIM support
The Bad
  • Lacks 4G LTE support
  • Average performing processor
  • Poor battery capacity
  • Below average display resolution

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAM with Oppo Neo 5 (2015). When you see iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAM Vs Oppo Neo 5 (2015) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAM stands against Oppo Neo 5 (2015) and which one you should buy. The best price of iBall Andi 4 IPS Tiger 1GB RAM is currently Rs. 4,999. The lowest price for Oppo Neo 5 (2015) is Rs. 8,000. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page