Compare iBall Andi 5K Infinito2 vs Coolpad Mega 2.5D

Feature Comparison

  • The Coolpad Mega 2.5D's Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 9.0% more
  • Both iBall Andi 5K Infinito2 and Coolpad Mega 2.5D have same Internal Storage
  • Coolpad Mega 2.5D's RAM is 33.0% more
 
iBall Andi 5K Infinito2
Coolpad Mega 2.5D
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
39 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
53 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Face Beauty Function, Voice Capture, Face Detection, Time Stamp, Live Photo Mode Touch to focus, Auto Flash, Geotagging, Digital Zoom, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) CoolUI 8.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
- 143.9 x 71.5 x 8.0   
Weight
- 143 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Champagne Gold, Royal Gold, Space Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
7GB 9.73GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 900 / 1800 MHz   
3G Bands
- UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- FD-LTE 1800 / 2300   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

iBall Andi 5K Infinito2 vs Coolpad Mega 2.5D Specs

Specs
iBall Andi 5K Infinito2Coolpad Mega 2.5D  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

Coolpad Mega 2.5D Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality and premium looks
  • Runs on the latest Android Marshmallow out of the box
  • 4G LTE enabled with VoLTE support
The Bad
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Battery life does not hold up well
  • Average cameras
  • Not that great performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare iBall Andi 5K Infinito2 with Coolpad Mega 2.5D. When you see iBall Andi 5K Infinito2 Vs Coolpad Mega 2.5D comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how iBall Andi 5K Infinito2 stands against Coolpad Mega 2.5D and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Coolpad Mega 2.5D is Rs. 7,380. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page