Compare InFocus M370 i vs Panasonic Eluga I3

Feature Comparison

  • The Panasonic Eluga I3's got 5.5 inch Screen Size, while InFocus M370 i's Screen Size is 5 inch
  • Internal Storage of InFocus M370 i is the same as Panasonic Eluga I3
  • Both InFocus M370 i and Panasonic Eluga I3 have same RAM
 
InFocus M370 i
Panasonic Eluga I3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
82 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 304 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geotagging, Autofocus, FHD Recording (1080p), 30 Frames per second Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- FitHome UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143 x 71.5 x 8.1 151 x 77 x 8.2   
Weight
125 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Rose Gold, Marine Blue, Champagne Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11.8GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2230mAh 2700mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

InFocus M370 i vs Panasonic Eluga I3 Specs

Specs
InFocus M370 iPanasonic Eluga I3  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2230mAh2700mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare InFocus M370 i with Panasonic Eluga I3. When you see InFocus M370 i Vs Panasonic Eluga I3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how InFocus M370 i stands against Panasonic Eluga I3 and which one you should buy. The best price of InFocus M370 i is currently Rs. 5,999. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga I3 is Rs. 7,990. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page