Compare InFocus M535 vs Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB

Feature Comparison

  • The InFocus M535 has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 3.0% more
  • Both InFocus M535 and Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of InFocus M535 is the same as Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB
 
InFocus M535
Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
97 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.3 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 277 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6592M   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
156.00 x 76.80 x 6.99 147.9 x 73.8 x 8.15   
Weight
158 grams 164 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Silver, Gold Champagne Gold, Midnight Blue, Smoke Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 12.9GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

InFocus M535 vs Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB Specs

Specs
InFocus M535Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.3 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Full HD video recording
  • 2GB of RAM helps in multitasking
The Bad
  • Only 8GB of internal storage
  • Average display sharpness at just 277PPI
  • Lacks 4G support
  • Average battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare InFocus M535 with Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB. When you see InFocus M535 Vs Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how InFocus M535 stands against Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB and which one you should buy. The best price of InFocus M535 is currently Rs. 6,650. The lowest price for Panasonic P55 Novo 16GB is Rs. 7,899. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page