Compare InFocus M680 vs Micromax Evok Dual Note

Feature Comparison

  • Both InFocus M680 and Micromax Evok Dual Note have same Screen Size
  • Micromax Evok Dual Note has 32GB Internal Storage, whereas InFocus M680 has 16GB Internal Storage
  • Micromax Evok Dual Note has 3GB RAM and InFocus M680 has 2GB RAM
 
InFocus M680
Micromax Evok Dual Note
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
65 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
59 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6750T   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
156 x 76.8 x 7.25 154 x 76.4 x 7.8   
Weight
- -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Silver Champagne, Prussian Blue   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

InFocus M680 vs Micromax Evok Dual Note Specs

Specs
InFocus M680Micromax Evok Dual Note  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  

InFocus M680 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good looking device even if the design is not the most original
  • Solid construction and feels very secure
  • Useful tweaks in the UI
  • Daylight shots from the camera are good
  • Call quality is really impressive
The Bad
  • The paint on the gold colour unit chips off with regular usage
  • Accessories seem to be made out of really cheap materials
  • Display legibility in direct sunlight is poor
  • Capacitive touch buttons have poor accuracy
  • Push the phone too hard and you will find the phone can get a fair bit warm

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare InFocus M680 with Micromax Evok Dual Note. When you see InFocus M680 Vs Micromax Evok Dual Note comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how InFocus M680 stands against Micromax Evok Dual Note and which one you should buy. The best price of InFocus M680 is currently Rs. 8,999. The lowest price for Micromax Evok Dual Note is Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page