Compare Intex Aqua 5.5 VR vs Intex Aqua 4G Mini

Feature Comparison

  • Intex Aqua 5.5 VR has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Intex Aqua 4G Mini has 4 inch Screen Size
  • The Intex Aqua 5.5 VR has 8GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • The Intex Aqua 5.5 VR's got 1GB RAM, while Intex Aqua 4G Mini's RAM is 512MB
 
Intex Aqua 5.5 VR
Intex Aqua 4G Mini
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
50 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 4 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD -   
Pixel Density
269 PPI 233.24 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6737 Spreadtrum SC9832A   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 512MB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Face Beauty, Panorama Mode, Gesture Capture, Anti Shake, Smile Shot -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash, Front LED Flash -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, Gyroscope -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
153.7 x 72.8 x 9.9 124.8 x 64.4 x 11.0   
Weight
176 grams 119 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne, Blue Black, Red   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.796W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.557W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 2GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 1450mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Intex Aqua 5.5 VR vs Intex Aqua 4G Mini Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua 5.5 VRIntex Aqua 4G Mini  
Screen Size 5.5 inch4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  
RAM 1GB512MB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh1450mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP0.3MP  

Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Impressive battery life
  • VoLTE & VR supported
  • Speaker output is decent
The Bad
  • Not that great a performer
  • Average cameras on either sides
  • Slow charging
  • Median VR experience

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua 5.5 VR with Intex Aqua 4G Mini. When you see Intex Aqua 5.5 VR Vs Intex Aqua 4G Mini comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua 5.5 VR stands against Intex Aqua 4G Mini and which one you should buy. The best price of Intex Aqua 5.5 VR is currently Rs. 4,499. The lowest price for Intex Aqua 4G Mini is Rs. 2,939. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page