Compare Intex Aqua Ace II vs Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB)'s got 3.0% more Screen Size
  • Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB) has 32GB Internal Storage, whereas Intex Aqua Ace II has 16GB Internal Storage
  • Both Intex Aqua Ace II and Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB) have same RAM
 
Intex Aqua Ace II
Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 282 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touchfocus, Face detection, White balance setting, ISO setting, Exposure compensation, self-timer, scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- Flyme OS 5.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
145.30 x 72.00 x 8.65 147.28 × 72.8 × 8.15   
Weight
149 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Champanage Gold, Blue, Matte Black   
Build Material
Plastic Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 3070mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Intex Aqua Ace II vs Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB) Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua Ace IIMeizu M5 (3GB/32GB)  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh3070mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua Ace II with Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB). When you see Intex Aqua Ace II Vs Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua Ace II stands against Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Meizu M5 (3GB/32GB) is Rs. 6,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page