Compare Intex Aqua Ace II vs Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G)

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Intex Aqua Ace II is the same as Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G)
  • Intex Aqua Ace II has 16GB Internal Storage, whereas Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G) has 8GB Internal Storage
  • Intex Aqua Ace II has 50.0% more RAM
 
Intex Aqua Ace II
Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
90 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
71 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 960 x 540 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 220 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek -   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 -   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Auto Flash, CMOS Image Sensor, Self-Timer, Touch to Focus, Scene Mode, ISO Setting   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
145.30 x 72.00 x 8.65 144.8 x 72.1 x 8.9   
Weight
149 grams 160 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold, Black, Silver   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 6 Month Accessories Warranty   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 256GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Intex Aqua Ace II vs Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G) Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua Ace IISamsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G)  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 3GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 5-megapixel front facing camera along with selfie flash.
  • TouchWiz UI feels right at home if you are a Samsung user.
The Bad
  • 1.5GB of RAM is inadequate, less compared to competition.
  • Only 3.2GB of user available storage out of 8GB.
  • Battery capacity lower when compared to alternatives.

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua Ace II with Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G). When you see Intex Aqua Ace II Vs Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua Ace II stands against Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J2 Ace (G532G) is Rs. 8,000. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page