Compare Intex Aqua Crystal Plus vs Motorola Moto C

Feature Comparison

  • Both Intex Aqua Crystal Plus and Motorola Moto C have same Screen Size
  • The Intex Aqua Crystal Plus's got 16GB Internal Storage, while Motorola Moto C's Internal Storage is 8GB
  • Intex Aqua Crystal Plus's got 50.0% more RAM
 
Intex Aqua Crystal Plus
Motorola Moto C
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
77 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
82 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 196 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.25GHz 1.1GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6737 MediaTek MT6737M   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
HDR, Face Beauty, Panorama Mode 1.4 µm pixel size, geo-tagging, touch focus, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 7.0 Nougat Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
140 x 71.2 x 8.3 145.5 x 73.6 x 9   
Weight
139 grams 154 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Starry Black, Fine Gold, Pearl White   
Build Material
Glass -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.634W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.799W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.63GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
2G Bands
GSM850/900/1800/1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
W900/2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
Band 40(2300),Band 3 (1800),Band 5 (850), Band 1(2100) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 2350mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Intex Aqua Crystal Plus vs Motorola Moto C Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua Crystal PlusMotorola Moto C  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh2350mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua Crystal Plus with Motorola Moto C. When you see Intex Aqua Crystal Plus Vs Motorola Moto C comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua Crystal Plus stands against Motorola Moto C and which one you should buy. The best price of Intex Aqua Crystal Plus is currently Rs. 4,999. The lowest price for Motorola Moto C is Rs. 5,220. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page