Compare Intex Aqua Power HD vs HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim

Feature Comparison

  • HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Intex Aqua Power HD has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Intex Aqua Power HD is the same as HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
  • RAM of Intex Aqua Power HD is the same as HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
 
Intex Aqua Power HD
HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
41 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
50 Value For Money Score
65 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592M MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 4MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama, OIS, BSI Sensor   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
140 x 72.5 x 9 157.7 × 78.9 × 7.9   
Weight
153 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black White, Dark Grey   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11.9GB 9.14GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Intex Aqua Power HD vs HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua Power HDHTC Desire 828 Dual Sim  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP4MP  

HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Intex Aqua Power HD Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display sharpness at 294PPI
  • Great battery life with the 4000mAh unit
The Bad
  • Lacks 4G support
  • Oudated Android version (4.4 KitKat)

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua Power HD with HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim. When you see Intex Aqua Power HD Vs HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua Power HD stands against HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim and which one you should buy. The best price of Intex Aqua Power HD is currently Rs. 8,229. The lowest price for HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim is Rs. 9,199. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page