Compare Intex Aqua Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime

Feature Comparison

  • The Intex Aqua Power's Screen Size measures in at 5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 5.0% more
  • Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime has 16GB Internal Storage, whereas Intex Aqua Power has 8GB Internal Storage
  • The Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime's RAM measures in at 2GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
Intex Aqua Power
Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
40 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
63 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
195.9 PPI 312.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Mediatek MT6592M, MediaTek MT6592M Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Panorama Shot, Face Beauty, Live Photo Mode, Smile Shot, HDR, Voice Capture, Face Detection, Selfie by BT and Earphone Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) MIUI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
141 x 71.9 x 9.3 134 x 67 x 9   
Weight
- -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, Gray   
Build Material
- Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 12.33GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 2200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Intex Aqua Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua PowerXiaomi Redmi 2 Prime  
Screen Size 5 inch4.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh2200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The screen is crisp and sharp thanks to a pixel density of 312.5 PPI
  • Very comfortable to hold and use single handedly
  • LTE support on both SIM cards
The Bad
  • The capacitive buttons at the bottom are not backlit
  • Outdated Android version with little to no scope of update
  • Autofocus on the camera can be a bit slot and takes its own sweet time to focus

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua Power with Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime. When you see Intex Aqua Power Vs Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua Power stands against Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime and which one you should buy. The best price of Intex Aqua Power is currently Rs. 7,200. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page