Compare Intex Aqua Trend vs Gionee F103 3GB RAM

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Intex Aqua Trend is the same as Gionee F103 3GB RAM
  • Both Intex Aqua Trend and Gionee F103 3GB RAM have same Internal Storage
  • Gionee F103 3GB RAM's RAM is 33.0% more
 
Intex Aqua Trend
Gionee F103 3GB RAM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
66 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735 MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Autofocus, Macro Mode, Continuous Shooting, Digital Zoom, Digital Image Stabilization, Panorama, HDR, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) Amigo 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
144.5 x 72.5 x 8.9 143 x 70.3 x 7.95   
Weight
152 grams 136 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champange, Metallic Silver Black, White   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 9.49GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2400mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Intex Aqua Trend vs Gionee F103 3GB RAM Specs

Specs
Intex Aqua TrendGionee F103 3GB RAM  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2400mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Gionee F103 3GB RAM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Lightweight Design
The Bad
  • Average Camera Output
  • Average Performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Intex Aqua Trend with Gionee F103 3GB RAM. When you see Intex Aqua Trend Vs Gionee F103 3GB RAM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Intex Aqua Trend stands against Gionee F103 3GB RAM and which one you should buy. The best price of Intex Aqua Trend is currently Rs. 9,990. The lowest price for Gionee F103 3GB RAM is Rs. 8,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 14, 2017.
Report an error on this page