Compare Itel It1553 vs Intex Aqua Crystal Plus

Feature Comparison

  • The Itel It1553's Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 9.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Itel It1553 is the same as Intex Aqua Crystal Plus
  • The Intex Aqua Crystal Plus has 2GB RAM, which is 50.0% more
 
Itel It1553
Intex Aqua Crystal Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
39 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
82 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6580 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
- HDR, Face Beauty, Panorama Mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
138.5 x 69.5 x 9.8 140 x 71.2 x 8.3   
Weight
- 139 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- 0.634W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.799W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Cover, Screen Guard Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.63GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
Yes Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 GSM850/900/1800/1900   
3G Bands
WCDMA 2100 W900/2100   
4G Bands
- Band 40(2300),Band 3 (1800),Band 5 (850), Band 1(2100)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
5050mAh 2100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Itel It1553 vs Intex Aqua Crystal Plus Specs

Specs
Itel It1553Intex Aqua Crystal Plus  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 5050mAh2100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Itel It1553 with Intex Aqua Crystal Plus. When you see Itel It1553 Vs Intex Aqua Crystal Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Itel It1553 stands against Intex Aqua Crystal Plus and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Crystal Plus is Rs. 5,499. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page