Compare Karbonn A27+ vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S

Feature Comparison

  • Both Karbonn A27+ and Xiaomi Redmi 3S have same Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Xiaomi Redmi 3S's is 75.0% more than Karbonn A27+
  • Xiaomi Redmi 3S's RAM is 75.0% more
 
Karbonn A27+
Xiaomi Redmi 3S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
18 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
45 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.3 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 430   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama,   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.1) MIUI 7   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
133.6 x 66 x 9.1 139.30 x 69.60 x 8.50   
Weight
- 144 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Silver, Gray, Gold   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 0.43W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.62W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.55GB 9.76GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 900 / 180   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Karbonn A27+ vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Specs

Specs
Karbonn A27+Xiaomi Redmi 3S  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 512MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

Xiaomi Redmi 3S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Very impressive battery life
  • Bright and sharp display with 294PPI
  • Handy form factor and good build quality
  • Rear and front cameras take good pictures compared to others
  • Latest Android Marshmallow based MIUI
The Bad
  • 2GB of RAM might max out, thanks to the heavily skinned UI from Xiaomi
  • Usability of either Dual SIMs or a Single SIM with a MicroSD card (Hybrid slot) can disappoint some

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Karbonn A27+ with Xiaomi Redmi 3S. When you see Karbonn A27+ Vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Karbonn A27+ stands against Xiaomi Redmi 3S and which one you should buy. The best price of Karbonn A27+ is currently Rs. 10,990. The lowest price for Xiaomi Redmi 3S is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page