• hrs
  • mins

Compare Karbonn K55 vs Intex Ultra 3000

 
Karbonn K55
Intex Ultra 3000
Add
Micromax X591
Micromax X591
Add
Nokia 105 2017
Nokia 105 2017
Show Only Differences
Add
Micromax X591
Add
Nokia 105 2017
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68VFM Score
82VFM Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
2.4 inch 2.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
320 x 240 pixels 320 x 240 pixels   
Screen Type
IPS LCD IPS LCD   
Pixel Density
167 PPI 167 PPI   
Refresh Rate
- -   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Notch
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
30.61% 27.47%   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Color
Grey White   
Chipset     
Brand
- -   
Processor Speed
- -   
Processor
- -   
Co-Processor
- -   
Number of Cores
- -   
RAM
- -   
Graphics
- -   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Camera
- -   
Number of Rear Cameras
- -   
Rear Camera Resolution
1.3MP 0.3MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Triple Rear Camera
- -   
Four Rear Camera
- -   
No. Of Selfie Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
- -   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Pop-up Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Smile detection, Effects, Continuos Shooting, Multi Shot -   
Video Recording Resolution
- -   
Front Video Resolution
- -   
Slow Motion Video Recording
- -   
Rear Camera Features
LED Flash -   
Front Camera Feature
- -   
Zoom
Yes, Digital Zoom Yes, Digital Zoom   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Proprietary Proprietary   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Proprietary Proprietary   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Non-Touchscreen Non-Touchscreen   
Sensors
- -   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
92 grams 109 grams   
Dimensions (mm)
119 x 49 x 11.20 124 x 52.4 x 13.8   
Height
119mm 124mm   
Width
49mm 52.4mm   
Thickness
11.2mm 13.8mm   
Storage     
Internal Storage
- -   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
8GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
Loudspeaker
- Yes   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Standard) SIM Mini (Standard) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Mini SIM   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Security
- -   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
2G Bands
- 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Connectivity
2G, Bluetooth Bluetooth, 2G   
SIM 1 Bands
GPRS:Available 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Network     
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1000mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   
Charge Time (20% - 100%)
- -   
Standby Time
Up to 200(2G) -   
Talk Time
Up to 3(2G) -   
Multimedia     
Music
Yes Yes, Music Formats: AAC, MP3, WAV   
Video Player
- Yes, Video Formats: 3GP, AVI, MPEG4   

Karbonn K55 vs Intex Ultra 3000 Specs

Specs
Karbonn K55Intex Ultra 3000  
Screen Size 2.4 inch2.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 1.3MP0.3MP  
RAM   
Battery Capacity 1000mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution   
This page helps you compare Karbonn K55 with Intex Ultra 3000. When you see Karbonn K55 Vs Intex Ultra 3000 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Karbonn K55 stands against Intex Ultra 3000 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 14, 2020.
Home Blog About Us FAQs Contact Us Careers Terms of use Privacy Policy Electronics Specifications Feed
Mobile Recharge
100 Million Smiles & Counting

© 2012-2020 Pricebaba™ All rights reserved. All trademarks / logos / brands are the property of their respective owners.

Report an error on this page