Compare Karbonn S9 Titanium vs Nokia Lumia 525

 
Karbonn S9 Titanium
Nokia Lumia 525
Add
Karbonn A19+
Karbonn A19+
Add
Lenovo S650
Lenovo S650
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
38 / 100
100 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
50VFM Score
73VFM Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 4 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 233.2 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Notch
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Screen to Body Ratio (%)
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Aspect Ratio
- -   
Touch Screen
- -   
Color
- Black, White, Yellow   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 836   
Co-Processor
- -   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 Adreno 305   
Architecture
- -   
Camera     
Camera
- -   
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Triple Rear Camera
- -   
Four Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP -   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus 1/4'' Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Slow Motion Video Recording
- -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus   
Zoom
- -   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Windows Phone   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) Windows Phone 8   
Custom UI
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Weight
176 grams 124 grams   
Dimensions (mm)
151.1 x 80.5 x 9.4 119.9 x 64 x 9.9   
Height
- -   
Width
- -   
Thickness
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
Loudspeaker
- -   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Dual 4G VoLTE
- -   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
SIM 1 Bands
- -   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
SIM 2 Bands
- -   
SIM 3 Bands
- -   
HDMI
- -   
Wi-Fi
- -   
Wi-Fi Features
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 1430mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
- Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   
Standby Time
- -   
Talk Time
- -   
Multimedia     
Music
- -   
Video Player
- -   

Karbonn S9 Titanium vs Nokia Lumia 525 Specs

Specs
Karbonn S9 TitaniumNokia Lumia 525  
Screen Size 5.5 inch4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh1430mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP  

Nokia Lumia 525 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The curved back makes the phone sit in the palm very comfortably
  • Metro UI is really well optimized and feels very fluid
  • Back panels on the phone can be interchanged
  • Dedicated camera button is really useful
The Bad
  • Lacks flash light on the back
  • No front facing camera
  • Poor outdoor visibility on the screen
  • Windows Phone ecosystem has very limited applications
This page helps you compare Karbonn S9 Titanium with Nokia Lumia 525. When you see Karbonn S9 Titanium Vs Nokia Lumia 525 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Karbonn S9 Titanium stands against Nokia Lumia 525 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated January 26, 2020.
Report an error on this page