Compare Karbonn Smart A51+ vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime's got 30.0% more Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime is 98.0% more
  • Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime's RAM is 91.0% more
 
Karbonn Smart A51+
We Love
Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
12 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
45 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
480 x 320 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
164.8 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 430   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
256MB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.2MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) MIUI 7   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132.0 x 67.5 x 9.25 139.30 x 69.60 x 8.50   
Weight
- 144 grams   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold, Silver, Gray   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- 0.43W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.62W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
512MB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
100MB 25.75GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
- GSM 900 / 1800   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1100mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Karbonn Smart A51+ vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime Specs

Specs
Karbonn Smart A51+Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.2MP13MP  
RAM 256MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1100mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Very impressive battery life
  • Handy form factor and good build quality
  • Rear and front cameras take good pictures compared to others
  • Snappy performance, thanks to the 3GB RAM and Marshmallow based MIUI
  • Features like fingerprint scanner and IR blaster are huge plus
The Bad
  • Usability of either Dual SIMs or a Single SIM with a MicroSD card (Hybrid slot) can disappoint some

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Karbonn Smart A51+ with Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime. When you see Karbonn Smart A51+ Vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Karbonn Smart A51+ stands against Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page