Compare Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360 vs Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360 is the same as Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313
  • Internal Storage of Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360 is the same as Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313
  • Both Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360 and Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 have same RAM
 
Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360
Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 / 100
94 / 100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56Value For Money
62Value For Money
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592M Mediatek MT6592M   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Sony BSI Sensor, Blink Capture, Panaroma Shots, Continuous Shots Auto Focus, Dual-LED Flash   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
138 x 70.5 x 6.3 -   
Weight
- -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 0.48W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.54W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Mini SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360 vs Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 Specs

Specs
Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP2MP  

Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display with 294PPI
  • Decent camera with full HD video recording
  • USB OTG support
The Bad
  • Many bloatwares pre-installed
  • Average battery life
  • Mediocre performance with just 1GB of RAM
  • Lacks 4G connectivity

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360 with Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313. When you see Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360 Vs Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Karbonn Titanium Mach Two S360 stands against Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas Xpress 2 E313 is Rs. 6,199. The prices for both these products were updated January 16, 2018.
Report an error on this page