Compare Karbonn Titanium Octane vs Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)

Feature Comparison

  • Karbonn Titanium Octane's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)'s 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • Karbonn Titanium Octane has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Karbonn Titanium Octane and Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) have same RAM
 
Karbonn Titanium Octane
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
73 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
74 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD Super AMOLED   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 245 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6592 Spreadtrum SC9830   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-450 MP4 Mali-400   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
145.7 × 71.2 × 7.9 132.6 x 69.3 x 8.9   
Weight
- 131 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White, Gold, Black   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 6 Month Accessories Warranty   
Body SAR
- 1.18W/kg   
Head SAR
- 1.58W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Karbonn Titanium Octane vs Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) Specs

Specs
Karbonn Titanium OctaneSamsung Galaxy J1 (2016)  
Screen Size 5 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Comfortable size for one handed usage
  • 4G LTE connectivity is present
  • Dual SIM support and expansion available via MicroSD card instead of a hybrid SIM slot
The Bad
  • Back of the device is known to be flimsy and creeky
  • Speakers are a bit of a dissapointment

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Karbonn Titanium Octane with Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016). When you see Karbonn Titanium Octane Vs Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Karbonn Titanium Octane stands against Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) is Rs. 6,890. The prices for both these products were updated December 16, 2017.
Report an error on this page