Compare Lava A97 vs Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lava A97 is the same as Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus
  • Internal Storage of Lava A97 is the same as Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus
  • Both Lava A97 and Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus have same RAM
 
Lava A97
Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
80 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
72 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
186.59 PPI 196 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC9832 Spreadtrum SC9832A   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP2 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection Panorama, HDR, GIF   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
145 X 72 X 9.2 143.1 x 72.1 x 10.1   
Weight
160 grams 150.6 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Blue, Gray Gold, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year on Handset and 6 Months on Accessories -   
Body SAR
- 1.284W/kg   
Head SAR
- 1.063W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 5.1GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 MHz GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz WCDMA 900/2100MHz   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300) (FDD Band 3,Band 5 TDD Bands :Band 40)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2350mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Lava A97 vs Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus Specs

Specs
Lava A97Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2350mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lava A97 with Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus. When you see Lava A97 Vs Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lava A97 stands against Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Lava A97 is currently Rs. 4,949. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Strong 5.1 Plus is Rs. 4,280. The prices for both these products were updated December 18, 2017.
Report an error on this page