Compare Lava Iris Fuel F1 vs Samsung Galaxy On5

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lava Iris Fuel F1 is the same as Samsung Galaxy On5
  • Both Lava Iris Fuel F1 and Samsung Galaxy On5 have same Internal Storage
  • The Lava Iris Fuel F1 has 2GB RAM, which is 25.0% more
 
Lava Iris Fuel F1
Samsung Galaxy On5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
69 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
195.9 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6580 Exynos 3475   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1.5GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
- Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
141 x 72 x 9.5 142.3 x 72.1 x 8.5   
Weight
148 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Black, Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- Brand Warranty of 1 Year Available for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories   
Body SAR
- 1.09W/kg   
Head SAR
- 1.4W/kg   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 4GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- Yes   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900), 20(800), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Lava Iris Fuel F1 vs Samsung Galaxy On5 Specs

Specs
Lava Iris Fuel F1Samsung Galaxy On5  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 2GB1.5GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy On5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display with adequate sharpness & brightness
  • Comfortable to hold
  • Acceptable battery life
The Bad
  • Inadequate RAM & internal storage
  • Laggy upon heavy usage
  • Rear camera performance not satisfactory
  • Average build quality
  • No ambient light sensor (auto-brightness)

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lava Iris Fuel F1 with Samsung Galaxy On5. When you see Lava Iris Fuel F1 Vs Samsung Galaxy On5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lava Iris Fuel F1 stands against Samsung Galaxy On5 and which one you should buy. The best price of Lava Iris Fuel F1 is currently Rs. 7,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy On5 is Rs. 6,390. The prices for both these products were updated December 9, 2017.
Report an error on this page