Compare Lava Magnum X604 vs HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM

Feature Comparison

  • Lava Magnum X604 has 6 inch Screen Size and HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Lava Magnum X604 has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Lava Magnum X604 and HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM have same RAM
 
Lava Magnum X604
HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
53 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
244.8 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6592   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
- Mali-450 MP4   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
BSI Sensor For Low Light Imaging Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, White balance settings, Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, HDR, Digital image stabilization, Exposure compensation   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.2 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) HTC Sense 5.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
163.3 x 84 x 8.9 142 x 71.9 x 9.15   
Weight
207 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Brown Pearl White, Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month on accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 2GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2800mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Lava Magnum X604 vs HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM Specs

Specs
Lava Magnum X604HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM  
Screen Size 6 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2800mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display quality, fairly sharp at 294PPI
  • Decent camera with Full HD video recording
The Bad
  • Average performance with just 1GB of RAM
  • Way outdated Android version (Jelly Bean 4.2)
  • Lacks 4G LTE support

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lava Magnum X604 with HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM. When you see Lava Magnum X604 Vs HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lava Magnum X604 stands against HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM and which one you should buy. The best price of Lava Magnum X604 is currently Rs. 11,500. The lowest price for HTC Desire 616 Dual SIM is Rs. 9,891. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page