Compare Lava X38 vs Micromax Evok Power

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lava X38 is the same as Micromax Evok Power
  • The Micromax Evok Power has 16GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • Micromax Evok Power has 2GB RAM and Lava X38 has 1GB RAM
 
Lava X38
Micromax Evok Power
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
67 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
71 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735P MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
Continuous Shooting, Digital Zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus, Face Detection, White balance, ISO Setting, Exposure Compensation, Self-timer, Scene mode -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer, Ambient Light Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
- 144.3 x 72.4 x 9.68   
Weight
- 167 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray, Blue Champagne, Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 MHz GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300) LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Lava X38 vs Micromax Evok Power Specs

Specs
Lava X38Micromax Evok Power  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lava X38 with Micromax Evok Power. When you see Lava X38 Vs Micromax Evok Power comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lava X38 stands against Micromax Evok Power and which one you should buy. The best price of Lava X38 is currently Rs. 6,299. The lowest price for Micromax Evok Power is Rs. 6,999. The prices for both these products were updated December 12, 2017.
Report an error on this page