Compare Lenovo A2010 vs Lava Iris Atom 3

Feature Comparison

  • The 5 inch Screen Size on the Lava Iris Atom 3 is 10.0% more
  • Both Lenovo A2010 and Lava Iris Atom 3 have same Internal Storage
  • Lenovo A2010's got 50.0% more RAM
 
Lenovo A2010
Lava Iris Atom 3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
65 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
65 Value For Money Score
57 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 854 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 196 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735M Spreadtrum SC7731G   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 512MB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-400   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 2MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Exposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer, Face detection Scene mode, Continouse shooting, Digital zoom, Digital image stabilization, Exposure compensation, ISO settings, White Balance setting, Geo tagging, White balance settings, face detection, touch focus, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 480p Video Recording   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (5.1) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
131.5 x 66.5 x 9.9 144.00 x 72.00 x 9.00   
Weight
137 grams 150 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile and 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.446W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.353W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.02GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 900 / 1800 MHz -   
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
LTE band 3(1800), 40(2300) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Lenovo A2010 vs Lava Iris Atom 3 Specs

Specs
Lenovo A2010Lava Iris Atom 3  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  
RAM 1GB512MB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP2MP  

Lenovo A2010 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • 4G Compatible
The Bad
  • 2nd SIM is 2G Only
  • 8GB of internal storage may seem inadequate

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo A2010 with Lava Iris Atom 3. When you see Lenovo A2010 Vs Lava Iris Atom 3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo A2010 stands against Lava Iris Atom 3 and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo A2010 is currently Rs. 6,000. The lowest price for Lava Iris Atom 3 is Rs. 4,439. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page