Compare Lenovo A6000 Plus vs Coolpad Note 3S

Feature Comparison

  • Coolpad Note 3S has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Lenovo A6000 Plus has 5 inch Screen Size
  • The Coolpad Note 3S has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • The Coolpad Note 3S's got 3GB RAM, while Lenovo A6000 Plus's RAM is 2GB
 
Lenovo A6000 Plus
Coolpad Note 3S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
54 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.36GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 415   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) CoolUI 8.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
141 x 70 x 8.2 154.5 x 77 x 8.6   
Weight
128 grams 167 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Red, White Gold, White   
Build Material
- Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
11GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2300mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

Lenovo A6000 Plus vs Coolpad Note 3S Specs

Specs
Lenovo A6000 PlusCoolpad Note 3S  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2300mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Coolpad Note 3S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Proficient design & overall build
  • Near stock Android 6.0 Marshmallow
  • Satisfactory performance, ideal for day-to-day usage
The Bad
  • Non-competent display
  • Sub-optimal cameras
  • Substandard battery life

Lenovo A6000 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decently sharp HD display with 294PPI
  • Support 4G LTE
  • Decent performance considering the chip and 2GB RAM
The Bad
  • Outdated Android version (Android 4.4 KitKat)
  • Average battery life
  • Records video up to 720p (HD) only
  • Not the best of processor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo A6000 Plus with Coolpad Note 3S. When you see Lenovo A6000 Plus Vs Coolpad Note 3S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo A6000 Plus stands against Coolpad Note 3S and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Coolpad Note 3S is Rs. 8,361. The prices for both these products were updated December 11, 2017.
Report an error on this page