Compare Lenovo A7000 Turbo vs Lenovo Phab

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Lenovo Phab is 21.0% more
  • Both Lenovo A7000 Turbo and Lenovo Phab have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Lenovo A7000 Turbo is the same as Lenovo Phab
 
Lenovo A7000 Turbo
Lenovo Phab
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
78 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
59 Value For Money Score
55 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 6.98 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 210.4 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6752 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Vibe UI 2.0 Vibe UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
152.6 x 76.2 x 8 186 x 97 x 8.9   
Weight
150 grams 250 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Matte Black, White Tuxedo Black   
Build Material
Polycarbonate Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 23.91GB   
Card Slot
Yes, MicroSD Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2900mAh 4250mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Lenovo A7000 Turbo vs Lenovo Phab Specs

Specs
Lenovo A7000 TurboLenovo Phab  
Screen Size 5.5 inch6.98 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2900mAh4250mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo Phab Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Huge display gives a great multimedia experience
  • Great battery life with 4250mAh unit
  • 4G LTE enabled
  • Expandable storage up to 64GB
The Bad
  • Below average display quality with just 210PPI
  • Mediocre performance with a chipset for budget devices
  • Not that great camera output
  • Huge size for comfortable usage as a mobile device

Lenovo A7000 Turbo Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent displat sharpness at 401PPI
  • Decent battery life to last through the day
  • Both SIMs slots are 4G enabled
The Bad
  • Average performance, lags during heavy tasks
  • Heating issues while performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Lacks Gorilla Glass protection

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo A7000 Turbo with Lenovo Phab. When you see Lenovo A7000 Turbo Vs Lenovo Phab comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo A7000 Turbo stands against Lenovo Phab and which one you should buy. The best price of Lenovo A7000 Turbo is currently Rs. 10,390. The prices for both these products were updated December 15, 2017.
Report an error on this page