Compare Lenovo Phab 2 vs Panasonic P88

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Phab 2 has 17.0% more Screen Size
  • Lenovo Phab 2's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • Lenovo Phab 2 has 3GB RAM, whereas Panasonic P88 has 2GB RAM
 
Lenovo Phab 2
Panasonic P88
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
58 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6.4 inch 5.3 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
229 PPI 277 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- 2.5D Curved Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT8735 MediaTek MT6737M   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP3 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama Continuous shooting, Panorama, Digital zoom, HDR, Digital image stabilization, ISO settings, Touch focus, Self timer, Geotagging, face detection, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Triple LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
175 x 89.5 x 5.5 146 x 73.25 x 8.35   
Weight
225 grams 156 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne Gold, Gunmetal Gray Gold, Charcoal Grey   
Build Material
- Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on mobile and 6 month for Accessories   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card, Screen Guard   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes, (Uses SIM2 slot) Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes -   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100 MHz   
4G Bands
- LTE band 3(1800), 5(850), 40(2300) MHz   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4050mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Lenovo Phab 2 vs Panasonic P88 Specs

Specs
Lenovo Phab 2Panasonic P88  
Screen Size 6.4 inch5.3 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 4050mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Lenovo Phab 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy & classy build quality
The Bad
  • Low pixel density
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • Mediocre camera

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Lenovo Phab 2 with Panasonic P88. When you see Lenovo Phab 2 Vs Panasonic P88 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Lenovo Phab 2 stands against Panasonic P88 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic P88 is Rs. 6,090. The prices for both these products were updated December 17, 2017.
Report an error on this page